SMPP access is normally disabled for users. Please contact us for more information on enabling access.
Ensure that your account password is no longer than 8 characters, to maintain compatibility with the SMPP specification.
service_typefield. As per the SMPP 3.4 specification, this is a C-octet string, so for the three routing options, the value can be a literal string containing one of “1”, “2” or “3”. If unspecified or invalid, routing group 2 will be used.
protocol_idas supported by our EAPI are currently not supported on our SMPP interface.
protocol_idis limited to the default setting
priority_flagis limited to the default setting
schedule_delivery_timeis limited to the default setting
validity_period: maximum 21 days after submission time, but destination networks are likely to impose their own, more restrictive limits
replace_if_present_flagis limited to the default setting
sm_default_msg_idis limited to the default setting
0x00(no status reports)
0x01(final delivery status outcome of “success” or “failure”)
user_message_referenceis not currently used but may be used in the future, e.g. to planned to allow customers to implement message duplication avoidance strategies
The ESME (SMPP client) is expected to either respond to
LINK_ENQUIRE within 60 seconds, or issue its own
LINK_ENQUIRE regularly (every 30 seconds recommended), failing which, the session will be dropped.
The BulkSMS SMSC will rate-limit received PDUs at 20 per second. Bursting above this rate into a limited-size buffer can occur but once the buffer is full, PDUs will initially be rejected with an
ESME_RTHROTTLED (0x58) status. If the ESME persists in sending at an excessive rate, ignoring throttling responses, PDUs will be dropped without a response. At very high excessive rates, the session may be dropped completely.
Multiple concurrent binds for the same account are enabled through the use of bind groups. This allows a customer, for example, to have two transmitter binds connected, with MOs and status reports received via a single third receiver bind. The scheme employed allows for various permutations and is controlled by the customer without intervention by BulkSMS.
Binds are grouped by SMPP system type specified by the ESME when binding. Typical ESME system types normally seen are “Logica”, “VMS” and “OTA”. This system type normally has no effect on the operation; the SMPP 3.4 specifcation describes it as used to “categorize the type of ESME”. In our implementation, the customer can optionally specify a system type that is a numeric string (up to 13 characters in length), to indicate which “bind group” this bind should fall under. All transmitter, receiver and transceiver binds using the same numeric system type are seen to form a single “bind group”. Status reports for messages received from transmitters in each bind group will be sent to receiver binds in that same bind group.
Note that we limit the number of concurrent connections per user account, across all that user’s bind groups. The limit is currently set at 10; please contact us if this is a problem.
For example, you have four transmitter binds (we’ll arbitrarily call them A, B, C and D) and two receiver binds (E and F), organised like this:
Delivery reports for messages received on A and B (bind group “0”) will be sent to E, because that is the receiver that is also in bind group “0”. Similarly, reports for messages from C and D will be sent to F. You can have as many bind groups as you need, but the system will limit the number of concurrent SMPP connections in total. You should, however, have at least one transmitter and one transceiver for each group. Transceivers are also supported, so a single transceiver bind is perfectly acceptable and is the most common configuration.
Any Mobile Originating (MO) messages routed to an SMPP user will always be sent to the “0” bind group, so users should at least have one receiver or transceiver bind in bind group “0”, or MO messages will queue until the system expires them.
Any bind which specifies a system type that is NOT numeric, e.g. “ABCDE”, or “Logica” will be treated as if it specified “0”. The same applies for a bind that doesn’t specify a system type (uses null). The effect of this is that customers who only need a single bind group (the most common case) can use their system’s default settings and their connections will be in group “0”, where it will receive any MO messages as well as all status reports.
A transceiver bind can serve the function of either a transmitter or receiver bind, or both. Consider the following example:
In this example, all four binds are able to send mobile terminating (MT) messages, but only binds C and D can receive status reports or MO messages. Status reports for messages sent via transmitter A as well as transceiver C will be sent to the only suitably-capable bind in bind group “0”, which is transceiver C. Status reports for B and D will be sent to D.
The system currently only supports routing MO messages and status reports to one connection per bind group at a time, being the connection to bind and join the bind group last. As a result, load balancing of status reports or MO messages for the same bind group over more than one connection in parallel is currently not supported. Since MO messages are always sent to bind group
0, this means there can currently only be one active bind receiving MOs for a customer at any point in time.
For example, referring to the the configuration used in example 1 above, again:
If an additional receiver “G” now connects after the above binds are connected and specifies system type / bind group “0”, then it will replace receiver E’s role and E will stop receiving status reports for group “0” as well as all MO messages. Any further status reports and MOs will now be sent to receiver G instead. Bind group “1” will be unaffected.
If receiver E then disconnects and reconnects, still using group “0”, it once again becomes the receiver bind to most recently join group “0”, so status reports and MOs once again revert to E and bind G will no longer receive them. This limitation may be addressed in the future, based on demand.